Michael Stone inquiry
20
The Inquiry into the Care and Treatment of Michael Stone was a high-profile investigation commissioned following the 1996 murders of Lin and Megan Russell and the attempted murder of Josie Russell in Chillenden, Kent.
The report, chaired by Robert Francis QC, was completed in 2000 but was not published until September 2006 due to Stone’s repeated legal appeals and his attempts to block its release on human rights grounds.
Key Findings of the Inquiry
The inquiry identified a "catalogue of errors" in the way statutory agencies managed Stone, who was a known violent offender with a severe Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) and a history of substance abuse.
Lack of Coordination: The most significant failure was the lack of communication between the NHS, Social Services, and the Probation Service. Information was fragmented, and no single agency took overall responsibility for his care.
Information Silos: The Prison Service had lost a substantial portion of Stone’s medical records, which prevented community doctors from seeing the full extent of his dangerous history.
Ignored Warnings: Just five days before the murders, Stone had an "aggressive outburst" and told a nurse he wanted to kill someone. While this was reported to a GP, critical details—such as Stone missing his medication—were not effectively shared with specialists.
Requests for Help: The report noted that Stone had repeatedly asked for detoxification and inpatient treatment for his drug addiction, but these requests were largely ignored by addiction services.
Multiple Identities: Stone was able to register with different GPs under different names, further complicating the tracking of his treatment and behavior.
The Conclusion on Preventability
Crucially, while the inquiry was scathing about the standard of care, it stopped short of saying the murders could have been prevented. Robert Francis QC stated that while there were many missed opportunities, Stone was an "extremely difficult and challenging" individual whose behaviour was often unpredictable.
Impact on Mental Health Policy
The Michael Stone case became a catalyst for major changes in UK law, specifically regarding "Dangerous People with Severe Personality Disorders" (DSPD).
The "Treatability" Debate: Before this case, psychiatrists often argued they could not detain someone under the Mental Health Act if their condition was "untreatable" (a common view of personality disorders at the time). The government used the Stone case to argue that public safety should take precedence over "treatability."
Mental Health Act 2007: The fallout from the inquiry led directly to amendments in the Mental Health Act. These changes made it easier to detain individuals with personality disorders if they posed a risk to others, regardless of whether a clinical "cure" was possible.
Inter-Agency Working: It led to the strengthening of the Care Programme Approach (CPA) and the development of MAPPA (Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements) to ensure that police, probation, and health services share information about high-risk individuals.
Current Status
Michael Stone continues to serve three life sentences. In recent years, his legal team has repeatedly challenged his conviction, pointing toward the serial killer Levi Bellfield as a potential alternative suspect, though the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has thus far declined to refer the case back to the Court of Appeal.
Key numbers at a glance
Recommendations
24
Months to complete
Cost in millions (if known)
2
Deaths (direct)
Recommendations
The 2006 Inquiry into the Care and Treatment of Michael Stone provided a roadmap for overhauling the intersection of mental health and criminal justice. While the report was famously critical of specific agency failures, its broader recommendations shifted the focus from clinical "cures" to public safety.
The summary of the recommendations and their current implementation status is categorized below:
1. Legislative Reform: The "Treatability" Loophole
The most significant impact of the Stone case was the debate over whether people with severe personality disorders could be detained if doctors deemed them "untreatable."
Recommendation: While the inquiry itself focused on service failures, it highlighted that the law was being interpreted too narrowly, allowing dangerous individuals to "fall through the cracks."
Status: [Implemented]. This led directly to the Mental Health Act 2007. It abolished the "treatability test," replacing it with an "appropriate treatment test." This means individuals can now be detained if appropriate medical treatment is available (including nursing and specialist care), even if it won't "cure" the underlying disorder.
2. Information Sharing & Record Management
The inquiry found a "catastrophic" failure in record-keeping, noting that the Prison Service had lost many of Stone’s medical files.
Recommendation: Establishment of a robust system for the transfer of medical records between the Prison Service, the NHS, and community providers.
Status: [Partially Implemented/Ongoing]. Digital health records (like the Summary Care Record and SystmOne) have significantly improved data flow between prisons and the NHS. However, "information silos" remain a persistent criticism in modern coroners' reports (Prevention of Future Death reports) today.
3. Multi-Agency Coordination
Stone was able to manipulate different agencies, such as registering with multiple GPs under different names to obtain various prescriptions.
Recommendation: Better integration between police, probation, and mental health services to manage high-risk individuals in the community.
Status: [Implemented]. This was the catalyst for the formalization of MAPPA (Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements). MAPPA is now a statutory requirement in England and Wales, ensuring that the police, probation, and health services meet regularly to share information on "Level 3" (high-risk) offenders.
4. Specialist Services for Personality Disorders
The inquiry highlighted that Stone had repeatedly asked for help with his addiction and aggression but was told no services were suitable for him.
Recommendation: Development of dedicated services for individuals with "Dangerous and Severe Personality Disorders" (DSPD) who do not fit into traditional mental health wards.
Status: [Implemented/Evolved]. The DSPD Programme was launched in the early 2000s, creating specialist units in high-secure prisons (like HMP Whitemoor) and hospitals (like Broadmoor). This has since evolved into the Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) Pathway, a multi-million-pound joint venture between the NHS and the Probation Service.
5. Managing Substance Abuse & Mental Health (Dual Diagnosis)
Stone’s violent outbursts were often linked to his drug use, yet drug services and mental health services treated him as two separate problems.
Recommendation: A "Dual Diagnosis" strategy where addiction and mental health are treated concurrently rather than sequentially.
Status: [Slow Progress]. While "Dual Diagnosis" is now a standard clinical term and policy goal, a 2022 report by the National Audit Office found that many patients still struggle to access mental health care if they have active substance abuse issues, indicating that this remains a systemic challenge.
Summary Table: Status at a Glance
Area of Reform | Recommendation Focus | Current Status |
Legal | Remove "treatability" barrier for detention | Fully Implemented via 2007 Act |
Communication | Multi-agency risk management | Fully Implemented via MAPPA |
Clinical | Specialist Personality Disorder units | Implemented via OPD Pathway |
Data | Transfer of prison medical records | Significantly Improved but not perfect |
Addiction | Integrated "Dual Diagnosis" care | Policy exists; delivery is inconsistent |
Podcasts by Inquests and Inquiries
Podcasts by other providers
Downloadable files
Links to other resources
Official & Legal Documents
The Official Inquiry Report (Archived/Mirror): This is a full PDF copy of the 2006 report titled "Report of the independent inquiry into the care and treatment of Michael Stone." It details the chronological failures of the prison and health services.
Stone v South East Coast Strategic Health Authority (2006): This legal judgment covers Michael Stone’s unsuccessful High Court attempt to block the publication of the inquiry report on human rights grounds. It provides a technical overview of why the report was delayed for six years.
House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Report (2000): An early parliamentary examination of "Dangerous People with Severe Personality Disorders" (DSPD) that uses the Stone case as a primary case study for legislative reform.
Academic & Professional Analysis
The Michael Stone Inquiry – A Reflection (Northumbria Journals): A scholarly look at the inquiry's impact on the "treatability" criterion in mental health law and how the "mad vs. bad" debate shaped the 2007 Mental Health Act.
BMJ Summary: Killer tries to stop publication: A brief medical perspective from the British Medical Journal explaining the mandatory nature of inquiries following homicides by psychiatric patients.
Contemporary News Coverage
The Guardian: Russell murders report lists sequence of failings (2006): A comprehensive news summary of the day the report was finally released, including the reaction from Shaun Russell.
The Guardian: How the big Michael Stone story was missed: An insightful look at how the media framed the inquiry findings, often ignoring the inquiry's conclusion that the murders might not have been preventable despite the "bungles."
Select videos
Some useful videos (if available)
Video slider
Useful playlist (if available)