Ayling
The Ayling Inquiry investigated how the NHS handled allegations of misconduct by GP Clifford Ayling and made recommendations to improve patient safety and complaint handling
The Ayling Inquiry was established to investigate how the NHS handled allegations about the conduct of Clifford Ayling, a general practitioner from Folkestone, Kent. Chaired by Dame Anna Pauffley, the inquiry took place from September 2002 to July 2004 and aimed to uncover systemic failures in addressing complaints and ensuring patient safety.
The inquiry was initiated due to growing concerns about Ayling's professional conduct, which included inappropriate behavior and poor clinical practices. Despite multiple complaints from patients and colleagues, the NHS's response was deemed inadequate, leading to the need for a thorough investigation.
One of the key findings was the lack of effective mechanisms for handling complaints and concerns within the NHS. The inquiry revealed that complaints were often not taken seriously, and there was a culture of defensiveness and reluctance to act on patient feedback. This resulted in a failure to protect patients from potential harm and to hold healthcare professionals accountable for their actions.
The Ayling Inquiry made several recommendations to improve the handling of complaints and concerns within the NHS. These included the need for better training for staff on handling complaints, the establishment of clear procedures for investigating concerns, and the importance of maintaining transparency and accountability in the complaints process. The inquiry also emphasized the need for a more patient-centered approach to healthcare, where patient feedback is valued and acted upon promptly.
The inquiry lasted for approximately 27 months and cost a significant amount, although the exact figure is not specified in the sources I found. The findings and recommendations of the Ayling Inquiry have led to changes in the way the NHS handles complaints and concerns, with a greater focus on patient safety and accountability.
In one sentence: The Ayling Inquiry investigated how the NHS handled allegations of misconduct by GP Clifford Ayling, leading to recommendations for improving patient safety and complaint handling.
Key numbers at a glance
Recommendations
27
Months to complete
Cost in millions (if known)
0
Deaths (direct)
Recommendations
Chaperone Policies: Individual NHS trusts should have the discretion to determine their own chaperone policies.
Professional Judgment: Doctors should use their professional judgment to assess whether a chaperone is needed for intimate examinations.
Patient Rights: Patients have the right to decline a chaperone.
Staff Availability: If a chaperone is not available, examinations should be postponed unless it's an emergency.
Podcasts by Inquests and Inquiries
Podcasts by other providers
Downloadable files
Chaperones: who needs them? - The BMJ: https://www.bmj.com/content/330/7498/s175.2
Jailed GP's victims give evidence - BBC News: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/kent/2984119.stm
Transcript and evidence / Inquiry into allegations about Clifford Ayling: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/transcript_and_evidence_inquiry
Learning from tragedy, keeping patients safe - Overview of the Government's action programme in response to the recommendations of the Shipman Inquiry: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c0891e5274a13acca2ea6/7014.pdf
Government response to the recommendations of the Shipman Inquiry's fifth report and to the Ayling, Neale and Kerr/Haslam inquiries: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-response-to-the-recommendations-of-the-shipman-inquirys-fifth-report-and-to-the-ayling-neale-and-kerrhaslam-inquiries
Links to other resources
Select videos
A full playlist gallery is at the bottom of the page.
Image Gallery
Video Gallery
The player below has a loaded playlist of videos related to this topic. Clicking on the fast forward/skip bottom will take you to the next video.